More In This Category
View Transcript
A recent example involves representing an individual who complained internally to the Chicago Transit Authority about what she believed were illegal activities. Shortly after, she was fired. After a multi-year battle, the case was finally brought to trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County. Following a week and a half of trial, the jury awarded a substantial monetary sum to the plaintiff.
However, the case didn’t end there. It was necessary to continue the fight at the appellate level for several years, ultimately requiring the Illinois Appellate Court and Illinois Supreme Court’s intervention just to get the whistleblower in a position to receive payment. This case exemplifies the rewarding yet taxing nature of whistleblower litigation and underscores the level of dedication required to advocate for the client over an extended period.
Chicago, IL trial attorney Michael Leonard discusses his experience in representing whistleblowers. He explains that I have a recent case that exemplifies the challenges and dedication required when representing whistleblowers. We had the privilege of advocating for an individual who lodged internal complaints against the Chicago Transit Authority, exposing what she believed to be illegal activities. Unfortunately, she faced repercussions and was unjustly terminated from her position.
After engaging in a protracted legal battle spanning multiple years, we successfully brought the case to trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County. For a week and a half, we presented our client’s compelling case before a jury. The outcome was highly gratifying, as the jury awarded our client a substantial monetary compensation as a result of her brave actions as a whistleblower.
However, our work didn’t end there. To overcome the challenges faced by whistleblowers, we had to continue fighting at the Appellate level for several years. It required navigating through the Illinois Appellate Court and the Illinois Supreme Court to secure the rightful payment for our client. This case serves as a poignant example of a rewarding yet demanding legal battle, highlighting the unwavering dedication necessary to support and protect whistleblowers over an extended period.