Products Liability Attorney in Beachwood, Ohio

What is your experience handling product liability cases?

More In This Category

View Transcript

I’ve been working on product liability
cases since I was a young lawyer in the
70s the 80s and 90s actually the product
liability cases were pretty ample for
the reason the manufacturers weren’t
guarding their machines in the workplace
and the torch system did what was
supposed to do during those years we
lawyers sued the manufacturers and the
products were made safer the products
were guarded during that period of time
I handled all kinds of product cases
point of operation injuries uh
repetitive motion injuries uh it was a
big part of my practice and the the
general theory of these cases is simple
if there’s a risk in in the use of a
product you design the risk out of the
product if you can’t design the risk out
of the product you guard against the
risk if you can’t guard against the risk
and many companies and manufacturers
will remove guards for efficiency and to
be able to produce products faster then
you warn against the the the risk and
the US you user assumes the risk of the
injury utilizing that theory we have
successfully handled product liability
cases and taking them to a good and just
result I have the experience to do that
and if you are injured in the workplace
or at home by a defective product as as
defined Ohio law we can handle that case

Beachwood, Ohio personal injury attorney Jeffrey A. Leikin talks about his experience handling product liability cases. The attorney has been working on product liability cases since beginning their career in the 1970s. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, these cases became increasingly common due to manufacturers’ frequent failures to safeguard their machines in the workplace. During this period, the legal system effectively held manufacturers accountable, leading to safer products and enhanced safety features.

The attorney has dealt with a wide range of product liability cases, including point-of-operation injuries and repetitive motion injuries, which comprised a significant portion of their practice. The fundamental principle guiding these cases is clear: if a product poses a risk during use, the manufacturer is responsible for designing the risk out of the product. If this is not achievable, the manufacturer must implement appropriate safeguards. In cases where neither option is viable—and many companies opt to remove safety guards to improve efficiency and speed up production—they must provide adequate warnings regarding the associated risks, which then places the onus on the user to assume the risk of injury.

By applying this framework, the attorney has successfully managed product liability cases, securing fair and just outcomes for clients. With extensive experience in this area, they are well-equipped to handle cases involving injuries caused by defective products, whether those incidents occur in the workplace or at home, as defined by Ohio law.

More Videos From This Lawyer