More In This Category
View Transcript
The most challenging thing about handling an auto defect case is the engineering and the science, and making sure that you obtain the documentation and information that’s necessary in order to prove the case. It’s no secret that major automobile manufacturers hide documents, try to inundate lawyers with massive amounts of documents so that you can’t find what we call the smoking gun, the document that shows the decision makers, and how they made the decision to put profits over people, how decisions were made to take shortcuts.
Shortcuts are always something that is likely to result in a safety issue, safety concern, and when you take a shortcut, you’re making a decision for somebody else. I bought your car. I bought your car, because I believed it was an automobile that was going to work. It was going to work safely. I’m gonna be driving it across country, I may be driving it at high rates of speed in a variety of different types of circumstances and conditions.
And so, when you, as a manufacturer, make a decision that you’re gonna save a little bit of money and to make this thing cheaper or less safe, you’re really putting my life in your hands, and you’re taking a risk and a chance on my life. And the difficult thing is to try to find those documents and that information that helps you prove that aspect of the case, but that typically is what the reality is.
Los Angeles, CA complex litigation attorney Raymond Boucher talks about what’s vital to find in an auto defect case. He explains that the most formidable aspect of handling an auto defect case lies in navigating the intricate engineering and scientific aspects while ensuring the acquisition of vital documentation and information to substantiate the case. It is no secret that prominent automobile manufacturers employ tactics to conceal documents and overwhelm lawyers with an overwhelming volume of paperwork, making it challenging to uncover the proverbial “smoking gun” — the document that reveals decision-makers’ prioritization of profits over people and the choices made to compromise safety by taking shortcuts.
Cutting corners in manufacturing processes always poses a potential safety concern, as these shortcuts impact the well-being of others. As a consumer, when I purchase your car, I place my trust in the belief that it is a reliable and safe vehicle. I may drive it across the country, at high speeds, and in various circumstances and conditions. Therefore, when a manufacturer opts to save costs or compromises safety, they are essentially jeopardizing my life, assuming a risk with my well-being. The challenge lies in uncovering the documents and information that substantiate this crucial aspect of the case, as this often reflects the reality behind such incidents.