More In This Category
View Transcript
It has been repeatedly demonstrated that cash bail does not effectively deter individuals from failing to appear in court. The real deterrent lies in the conditions of bond set by the court. Just because a person cannot initially afford to pay the cash bond imposed by a judge does not mean that if they do manage to secure the money, they are more likely to flee. Simply put, money does not prevent someone from running away; it is the specific conditions attached to their release that do.
Effective bond conditions might include electronic monitoring, restrictions on visiting certain locations, or requiring the individual to surrender their passport. These measures are put in place by judges to ensure that the person does not flee. If someone is determined to run, cash bail is unlikely to stop them. This is why the state can file verified petitions seeking detention if they believe an individual poses a significant flight risk. A judge can then consider this evidence and decide whether there are any release conditions that could mitigate the risk of flight or potential danger to the community. If the judge finds that no such conditions exist, they may choose to detain the individual.
New York, NY criminal defense attorney Gal Pissetzky talks about cash bail being abolished in Illinois and whether the public can be assured that those accused of crimes will return to court. Studies have consistently shown that cash bail is not an effective deterrent for ensuring court appearances. Instead, the true deterrent is found in the specific conditions of bond set by the court. The inability of an individual to initially pay the cash bond does not indicate that, if they manage to obtain the money, they are more inclined to flee. In essence, financial requirements alone do not prevent someone from absconding; it is the structured release conditions that are effective in this regard.
Judges may impose various bond conditions, such as electronic monitoring, travel restrictions, or the surrender of a passport, to reduce the risk of flight. These measures are designed to ensure compliance and prevent the individual from fleeing. In cases where the state believes that a defendant presents a significant flight risk, it may file a verified petition for detention. The judge then evaluates the evidence to determine whether any release conditions could adequately address the flight risk or potential danger posed to the community. If no suitable conditions are found, the judge may decide to detain the individual pending trial.