00:04
Karlsson ve harmony is one of those
00:06
cases where even though it technically
00:08
was not an employment case it was the
00:11
kind of case that an employment lawyer
00:13
would see to bring Nate Carlson was a
00:16
guy who sought to use a harmony to find
00:18
a same-sex partner Nate’s gay but at the
00:22
time the system wouldn’t allow him to do
00:25
it it would only allow folks to seek a
00:27
man seeking a woman or a woman seeking a
00:31
man after a very long fight that’s not
00:34
the case anymore
00:35
the system works differently now and it
00:38
works better and it works for everyone
00:42
we’re very proud of that case and we’re
00:44
very proud of that case because nobody
00:47
else had taken it on but as employment
00:49
lawyers we knew about the whole breadth
00:52
of anti-discrimination laws and we knew
00:54
that law is very very similar to those
00:57
that we used to protect the rights of
00:59
gay individuals in the workplace could
01:01
be used to protect the rights of gay
01:02
individuals out there in the consumer
01:06
place