It’s actually not – if we can capture the activity on video, I think most judges will look at an officer’s testimony and video and if those two things disagree, it’s difficult for a judge to say, “Well, the video must be wrong.” It’s easier to say the officer’s recollection may be wrong or that he may be mistaken or I suppose in extreme circumstances that he just made it all up. But that’s the good part of having video. The bad part of having video, of course, is sometimes all those bad things did actually happen, and it makes it a little difficult for me to defend against it.