More In This Category
View Transcript
the main challenge here right now is the
Uber and Lyft they deny that they’re
common carriers
and so there’s a threshold fight in each
one of these cases to say well no you’re
a common carrier you’re carrying
passengers For Hire you’re just like a
taxi company you owe your passenger this
obligation and that comes into play
particularly when we’re dealing with
some of these as you’ve seen in
newspaper driver assault cases where a
taxi company would be responsible for
its driver assaulting someone
other other companies wouldn’t be
because of the relationship between the
carrier and the passenger and so that
becomes a Battleground in the Uber and
Lyft cases
Contact Michael Conley
Email This Lawyer
(781) 848-9891
See All This Lawyer's Videos
Visit Lawyer's Website
Braintree, MA personal injury attorney Michael Conley discusses the challenges faced in Uber/Lyft accident cases. He explains that the primary challenge currently revolves around Uber and Lyft. At 0:08, both companies deny being common carriers. Therefore, in each case, there is a threshold fight to establish their classification as common carriers, similar to taxi companies. This is crucial because common carriers owe their passengers certain obligations. This aspect becomes particularly relevant in instances such as driver assault cases, where a taxi company would be held responsible for its driver’s actions, whereas other companies might not be. The relationship between the carrier and the passenger becomes a battleground in the legal disputes involving Uber and Lyft.