Children’s Rights Attorney in Portland, Oregon

How is an attorney for a child different than an attorney for an adult?

More In This Category

View Transcript

so in Oregon in family law cases where
children are appointed attorneys there’s
two types of lawyering for children
depending on their age now it’s specific
to the child or the children it’s not a
dead set rule but you know if you’re
representing a younger child you
typically advocate for the best interest
of the child because the child can’t
really formulate a position on something
like who they want to live with how much
time they want to spend with the other
parent or if it’s an older child you act
as an advocacy lawyer which means you’re
essentially a lawyer for the child and
you’re representing their interests so
the difference between representing a
child is that you might be representing
their best interests as opposed to
representing their interests which if
you are representing a parent you would
absolutely be representing their
interests

Portland, OR family law attorney Matthew Muenzen talks about how an attorney for a child is different than an attorney for an adult. He notes that in Oregon family law cases where children are appointed attorneys, there are generally two approaches to representing a child, depending on the child’s age and capacity. For younger children, the attorney typically advocates for the child’s best interests, as these children are often unable to articulate a clear preference regarding matters such as living arrangements or time spent with each parent.

For older children, the attorney acts as an advocacy lawyer, representing the child’s expressed interests and preferences. The key distinction is that representing a child can involve advocating for their best interests when they cannot fully express a position, whereas representing a parent always involves advocating for that parent’s specific interests.

More Videos From This Lawyer